Media gifts - Commentshttp://www.garyhall.info/journal/en-GBSquarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)Gary Hall comments on Open notebook humanitiesGary HallMon, 05 Sep 2011 13:24:41 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/8/31/open-notebook-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/14987239Thanks. Will do.

In fact we have a new series of 20 open books coming out at the end of this month that are doing just that. It includes one on open science - although the whole series is about the relation between the open science and the humanities really.

]]>Jean-Claude Bradley comments on Open notebook humanitiesJean-Claude BradleyMon, 05 Sep 2011 12:25:44 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/8/31/open-notebook-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/14987029Great work - keep pushing the limits of openness on the humanities front! There are so many options now for experimentation.

]]>Jessica Dunne comments on The open scholarship full disclosure initiative: a subversive proposalJessica DunneThu, 14 Jul 2011 04:41:25 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/5/2/the-open-scholarship-full-disclosure-initiative-a-subversive.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/13789635I like this proposal! Best of luck to you!

]]>Gary Hall comments on On the limits of openness V: there are no digital humanitiesGary HallMon, 17 Jan 2011 15:28:18 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/1/12/on-the-limits-of-openness-v-there-are-no-digital-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/11245573Tara, I'm hoping to say more about questions of power, ideology, affect, race, etc in relation to the digital humanities in my next installment. But I'm sorry I missed the discussion at the MLA. Sounds intriguing.

Yes, very much looking forward to being with you all at USC in the summer.

]]>Gary Hall comments on On the limits of openness V: there are no digital humanitiesGary HallSun, 16 Jan 2011 11:55:46 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/1/12/on-the-limits-of-openness-v-there-are-no-digital-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/11239167David, I agree. That's exactly what I was trying to point toward at the end when I stress that 'what I am attempting to show here by drawing on the philosophy of Lyotard and others, is that the digital is not something that can now be added to the humanities - for the simple reason that the humanities can be seen to have had an understanding of, and engagement with, computing and the digital for some time now.'

I'll certainly take a look at your comments on the first, second and third wave of the Digital Humanities. Thanks.

]]>David Berry comments on On the limits of openness V: there are no digital humanitiesDavid BerrySun, 16 Jan 2011 11:14:58 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/1/12/on-the-limits-of-openness-v-there-are-no-digital-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/11239105Interesting piece. Although I don't think computational=scientific. Indeed, the humanities might offer a critical theory of technology rather than themselves being overwhelmed by scientism. The exchange of knowledge and ideas goes in both directions.

Thought you might be interested in my thoughts in Digital Humanities: First, Second and Third Wave.

]]>Gary Hall comments on On the limits of openness V: there are no digital humanitiesGary HallFri, 14 Jan 2011 10:07:49 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/1/12/on-the-limits-of-openness-v-there-are-no-digital-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/11192558Thanks, Danny. I'll check out The Cultural Logic of Computation. Sounds interesting.

]]>Tara McPherson comments on On the limits of openness V: there are no digital humanitiesTara McPhersonFri, 14 Jan 2011 03:46:15 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/1/12/on-the-limits-of-openness-v-there-are-no-digital-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/11181967Very timely set of questions coming off the digital humanities conversations at MLA. It remains quite difficult to foreground questions of power, ideology, affect, race, etc. in many "DH" conversations. Difficult, but not impossible. I also think it's imperative that those of us interested in such questions engage in the terrain of the digital humanities and help shape the conversation. I'm glad you'll be at USC this summer to help us with this task.

]]>Danny comments on On the limits of openness V: there are no digital humanitiesDannyThu, 13 Jan 2011 09:45:34 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2011/1/12/on-the-limits-of-openness-v-there-are-no-digital-humanities.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/11150325Great piece. Was reading Golumbia's excellent bk "The Cultural Logic of Computation" <http://aaaaarg.org/text/18713/cultural-logic-computation> last year which is pretty useful on this dynamic. It's all about the frame and "digital" has its own.

]]>Gary Hall comments on On the limits of openness I: the digital humanities and the computational turn to data-driven scholarshipGary HallFri, 19 Nov 2010 18:36:36 +0000http://www.garyhall.info/journal/2010/11/19/on-the-limits-of-openness-i-the-digital-humanities-and-the-c.html#comments492332:7171203:comment/10591991Thanks for the comment. In subsequent parts of 'On the Limits of Openness' I want to explore some of the possible social and political reasons why this movement is so much in one direction. In particular, I want to ask whether the take up of practical techniques and approaches from computing science isn't providing some areas of the humanities with a means of defending themselves in an era of global economic crisis and severe cuts to higher education.

]]>